Another cyclist down....
#2
Posted 29 January 2008 - 06:29 AM
Slingen, on Jan 29 2008, 05:04 AM, said:
Maybe more cyclists on the road?
From the perspective of a cyclists, I hate cars. I really do! Too damn many cars! :-(
Second job of Govt: Protect people from each other
But it must never become the job of Govt to protect people from themselves!
#3
Posted 29 January 2008 - 08:21 AM
Slingen, on Jan 29 2008, 05:04 AM, said:
You are not imagining things. And I am not quit sure if there are more cyclists on the road. What I know and feel is cars are way more aggressive these days, and it seems that no week passes by without somebody making serious attempt on my life. I am not sure if it is just stupidity (on my part or them), or people don’t expect you on the road these days.
#4
Posted 29 January 2008 - 09:29 AM
Eggman, on Jan 29 2008, 08:21 AM, said:
Niether case (stupidity or not expecting you on the road) is an attempt on your life. An unfortunate and reckless near miss, perhaps, but to imply intent is impossible to determine. And if their intent is to take your life, then they are a bad aim.
#5
Posted 29 January 2008 - 10:24 AM
#7
Posted 29 January 2008 - 11:23 AM
klages, on Jan 29 2008, 09:29 AM, said:
Eggman, on Jan 29 2008, 08:21 AM, said:
Niether case (stupidity or not expecting you on the road) is an attempt on your life. An unfortunate and reckless near miss, perhaps, but to imply intent is impossible to determine. And if their intent is to take your life, then they are a bad aim.
In the utmost unfortunate event you are hit does it really matter what is the intent. It is going to hurt or worse. What I am saying is just everybody be careful.
#8
Posted 29 January 2008 - 11:38 AM
Eggman, on Jan 29 2008, 11:23 AM, said:
klages, on Jan 29 2008, 09:29 AM, said:
Eggman, on Jan 29 2008, 08:21 AM, said:
Niether case (stupidity or not expecting you on the road) is an attempt on your life. An unfortunate and reckless near miss, perhaps, but to imply intent is impossible to determine. And if their intent is to take your life, then they are a bad aim.
In the utmost unfortunate event you are hit does it really matter what is the intent.
Yes.
#9
Posted 29 January 2008 - 12:13 PM
oldfatguy, on Jan 29 2008, 10:38 AM, said:
Eggman, on Jan 29 2008, 11:23 AM, said:
klages, on Jan 29 2008, 09:29 AM, said:
Eggman, on Jan 29 2008, 08:21 AM, said:
Niether case (stupidity or not expecting you on the road) is an attempt on your life. An unfortunate and reckless near miss, perhaps, but to imply intent is impossible to determine. And if their intent is to take your life, then they are a bad aim.
In the utmost unfortunate event you are hit does it really matter what is the intent.
Yes.
Double Yes.
Accidents happen and it sucks when you get hit (1st hand knowledge on this) but when its a hit and run (1st hand knowledge on this also) it really sucks. My ex wife was hit in downtown STL by an old guy that didn't see her, she turned left when she had the away and she couldn't alter course so she got smashed. The guy stopped and called 911 and she was rushed to the hospital and after a few months was healthy again. When I was hit in GA I was found on the side of road broken and bloody trying to ride my bike which had the fork sheered off. When asked if I knew where i was I responded "judging by your accent somewhere in the south." I had internal bleeding and had lost consciousness and was airlifted to Atlanta.
#10
Posted 29 January 2008 - 12:52 PM
Slingen, on Jan 29 2008, 05:04 AM, said:
Perhaps they are getting more press? This may be due in part to I64 construction and in part to residual ToM interest?
Intent does have alot to do with it.
Sorry for turning someones bad luck into a pragmatic discussion.
— Mark Twain
Where does colorful lycra fit into this philosophy?
#11
Posted 29 January 2008 - 01:07 PM
Speaking of intent, we recently had a great result with the DA here in Lawrence, KS. While he agreed that he had cause to bring assault charges against a driver for swerving at and slamming on the brakes in front of 4 cyclists traveling at almost 30 mph, no jury (comprised, of course, entirely of motorists and not of cyclists) would convict because intent was impossible to prove, especially since there were no skid marks or (fortunately) collisions. However, the DA agreed to consider reckless driving charges. After all, coming to a sudden stop in front of moving traffic, on a highway open to 55-mph traffic, is certainly reckless. They charged reckless, the guy didn't show, a warrant was issued, he was arrested and pled guilty. 6 months license suspension and $250 fine. This is important, because a felony assault conviction would have been pled down and would have had ZERO impact on his driving record. I recently wrote about this to the VeloNews bike lawyer, Bob Mionske, with the moral of the story: don't try to bite off more than the prosecution can chew--bring the proper (and most effective) charge. Felony assault is sexy, but reckless gets the driver's license suspended.
Hope the rider is OK and that the driver is found and charges brought. Check the grilles of the dark SUV's you see if possible, and keep that cell phone handy. It could mean one more criminal off the road.
E
#12
Posted 29 January 2008 - 02:33 PM
For information leading to the arrest and conviction of the driver who committed this hit in run we have x amount
The chances of anyone ever collecting this money would be on the slim side. so it we might be able to roll it over to the next.
Ill start the pot with $100.00
anyone
total as of 3:11pm is $220.00
#13
Posted 29 January 2008 - 02:42 PM
People who hit cyclists, pedestrians or other cars and take off should be jailed.
#14
Posted 29 January 2008 - 02:47 PM
Patrick, on Jan 29 2008, 02:33 PM, said:
For information leading to the arrest of the driver who committed this hit in run we have x amount
The chances of anyone ever collecting this money would be on the slim side. so it we might be able to roll it over to the next.
Ill start the pot with $100.00
anyone
I'll add another 100$

Sign In
Register
Help



MultiQuote
